Open
Published Online: 11 September 2018
Accepted: August 2018
Biointerphases 13, 06D404 (2018); https://doi.org/10.1116/1.5043373
more...View Affiliations
Inhalation of combustion-derived ultrafine particles (≤0.1 μm) has been found to be associated with pulmonary and cardiovascular diseases. However, correlation of the physicochemical properties of carbon-based particles such as surface charge and agglomeration state with adverse health effects has not yet been established, mainly due to limitations related to the detection of carbon particles in biological environments. The authors have therefore applied model particles as mimics of simplified particles derived from incomplete combustion, namely, carbon nanodots (CNDs) with different surface modifications and fluorescent properties. Their possible adverse cellular effects and their biodistribution pattern were assessed in a three-dimensional (3D) lung epithelial tissue model. Three different CNDs, namely, nitrogen, sulfur codoped CNDs (N,S-CNDs) and nitrogen doped CNDs (N-CNDs-1 and N-CNDs-2), were prepared by microwave-assisted hydrothermal carbonization using different precursors or different microwave systems. These CNDs were found to possess different chemical and photophysical properties. The surfaces of nanodots N-CNDs-1 and N-CNDs-2 were positively charged or neutral, respectively, arguably due to the presence of amine and amide groups, while the surfaces of N,S-CNDs were negatively charged, as they bear carboxylic groups in addition to amine and amide groups. Photophysical measurements showed that these three types of CNDs displayed strong photon absorption in the UV range. Both N-CNDs-1 and N,S-CNDs showed weak fluorescence emission, whereas N-CNDs-2 showed intense emission. A 3D human lung model composed of alveolar epithelial cells (A549 cell line) and two primary immune cells, i.e., macrophages and dendritic cells, was exposed to CNDs via a pseudo-air-liquid interface at a concentration of 100 μg/ml. Exposure to these particles for 24 h induced no harmful effect on the cells as assessed by cytotoxicity, cell layer integrity, cell morphology, oxidative stress, and proinflammatory cytokines release. The distribution of the CNDs in the lung model was estimated by measuring the fluorescence intensity in three different fractions, e.g., apical, intracellular, and basal, after 1, 4, and 24 h of incubation, whereby reliable results were only obtained for N-CNDs-2. It was shown that N-CNDs-2 translocate rapidly, i.e., >40% in the basal fraction within 1 h and almost 100% after 4 h, while ca. 80% of the N-CNDs-1 and N,S-CNDs were still located on the apical surface of the lung cells after 1 h. This could be attributed to the agglomeration behavior of N-CNDs-1 or N,S-CNDs. The surface properties of the N-CNDs bearing amino and amide groups likely induce greater uptake as N-CNDs could be detected intracellularly. This was less evident for N,S-CNDs, which bear carboxylic acid groups on their surface. In conclusion, CNDs have been designed as model systems for carbon-based particles; however, their small size and agglomeration behavior made their quantification by fluorescence measurement challenging. Nevertheless, it was demonstrated that the surface properties and agglomeration affected the biodistribution of the particles at the lung epithelial barrier in vitro.
  1. 1. A. L. Braga, A. Zanobetti, and J. Schwartz, Eur. Respir. J. 16, 723 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1399-3003.2000.16d26.x, Google ScholarCrossref
  2. 2. S. A. Bremner, H. R. Anderson, R. W. Atkinson, A. J. Mcmichael, D. P. Strachan, J. M. Bland, and J. S. Bower, Occup. Environ. Med. 56, 237 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1136/oem.56.4.237, Google ScholarCrossref
  3. 3. D. W. Dockery, C. A. Pope, X. Xu, J. D. Spengler, J. H. Ware, M. E. Fay, B. G. Ferris, Jr., and F. E. Speizer, N. Engl. J. Med. 329, 1753 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199312093292401, Google ScholarCrossref
  4. 4. C. A. Pope III, R. T. Burnett, M. J. Thun, E. E. Calle, D. Krewski, K. Ito, and G. D. Thurston, J. Am. Med. Assoc. 287, 1132 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.287.9.1132, Google ScholarCrossref
  5. 5. A. H. Choudhury, M. Gordian, and S. S. Morris, Arch. Environ. Health 52, 113 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1080/00039899709602873, Google ScholarCrossref
  6. 6. D. E. Abbey, N. Nishino, W. F. Mcdonnell, R. J. Burchette, S. F. Knutsen, W. Lawrence Beeson, and J. X. Yang, Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 159, 373 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm.159.2.9806020, Google ScholarCrossref
  7. 7. E. Aga et al., Eur. Respir. J. 21, 28s (2003). https://doi.org/10.1183/09031936.03.00402803, Google ScholarCrossref
  8. 8. R. Kaiser, I. Romieu, S. Medina, J. Schwartz, M. Krzyzanowski, and N. Künzli, Environ. Health 3 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1186/1476-069X-3-4, Google ScholarCrossref
  9. 9. A. Zanobetti et al., Environ. Health Perspect. 111, 1188 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.5712, Google ScholarCrossref
  10. 10. A. Nemmar, P. Hoet, B. Vanquickenborne, D. Dinsdale, M. Thomeer, M. F. Hoylaerts, H. Vanbilloen, L. Mortelmans, and B. Nemery, Circulation 105, 411 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1161/hc0402.104118, Google ScholarCrossref
  11. 11. N. L. Mills et al., Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 173, 426 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.200506-865OC, Google ScholarCrossref
  12. 12. P. Wiebert, A. Sanchez-Crespo, R. Falk, K. Philipson, A. Lundin, S. Larsson, W. Moller, W. G. Kreyling, and M. Svartengren, Inhal. Toxicol. 18, 741 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1080/08958370600748455, Google ScholarCrossref
  13. 13. N. Li, S. Georas, N. Alexis, P. Fritz, T. Xia, M. A. Williams, E. Horner, and A. Nel, J. Allergy Clin. Immun. 138, 386 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2016.02.023, Google ScholarCrossref
  14. 14. G. Oberdorster, Int. Arch. Occup. Environ. Health 74, 1 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/s004200000185, Google ScholarCrossref
  15. 15. J. Heyder, J. Gebhart, G. Rudolf, C. F. Schiller, and W. Stahlhofen, J. Aerosol Sci. 17, 811 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-8502(86)90035-2, Google ScholarCrossref
  16. 16. J. S. Patton and P. R. Byron, Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 6, 67 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrd2153, Google ScholarCrossref
  17. 17. F. Shirmohammadi, S. Hasheminassab, A. Saffari, J. J. Schauer, R. J. Delfino, and C. Sioutas, Sci. Total Environ. 541, 1083 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.09.133, Google ScholarCrossref
  18. 18. J. Wang, G. Liu, K. C.-F. Leung, R. Loffroy, P.-X. Lu, and Y. X. J. Wang, Curr. Pharm. Des. 21, 5401 (2015). https://doi.org/10.2174/1381612821666150917093232, Google ScholarCrossref
  19. 19. Y. Park, J. Yoo, B. Lim, W. Kwon, and S. W. Rhee, J. Mater. Chem. A 4, 11582 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1039/C6TA04813G, Google ScholarCrossref
  20. 20. P. Miao, K. Han, Y. Tang, B. Wang, T. Lin, and W. Cheng, Nanoscale 7, 1586 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1039/C4NR05712K, Google ScholarCrossref
  21. 21. B. M. Rothen-Rutishauser, S. G. Kiama, and P. Gehr, Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. 32, 281 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1165/rcmb.2004-0187OC, Google ScholarCrossref
  22. 22. D. A. Urban, A. M. Milosevic, D. Bossert, F. Crippa, T. L. Moore, C. Geers, S. Balog, B. Rothen-Rutishauser, and A. Petri-Fink, Colloid Interface Sci. Commun. 22, 29 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colcom.2017.12.001, Google ScholarCrossref
  23. 23. A. Lehmann, C. Brandenberger, F. Blank, P. Gehr, and B. Rothen-Rutishauser, “A 3D model of the human epithelial airway barrier,” in Alternatives to Animal Testing, edited by M. L. Yarmush and R. S. Langer (Artech House, Norwood, 2010), pp. 239–260. Google Scholar
  24. 24. S. Steiner et al., Atmos. Environ. 81, 380 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.08.059, Google ScholarCrossref
  25. 25. E. Durantie, D. Vanhecke, L. Rodriguez-Lorenzo, F. Delhaes, S. Balog, D. Septiadi, J. Bourquin, A. Petri-Fink, and B. Rothen-Rutishauser, Part. Fibre Toxicol. 14, 49 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12989-017-0231-3, Google ScholarCrossref
  26. 26. C. Endes et al., Part. Fibre Toxicol. 11, 1 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12989-014-0040-x, Google ScholarCrossref
  27. 27. D. Qu, M. Zheng, L. Zhang, H. Zhao, Z. Xie, X. Jing, R. E. Haddad, H. Fan, and Z. Sun, Sci. Rep. 4, 5294 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep05294, Google ScholarCrossref
  28. 28. N. Papaioannou, A. Marinovic, N. Yoshizawa, A. E. Goode, M. E. Fay, A. Khlobystov, M.-M. Titirici, and A. Sapelkin, Sci. Rep. 8, 6559 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-25012-8, Google ScholarCrossref
  29. 29. N. Baker Sheila and A. Baker Gary, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 49, 6726 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.200906623, Google ScholarCrossref
  30. 30. P. Lv, Y. Yao, H. Zhou, J. Zhang, Z. Pang, K. Ao, Y. Cai, and Q. Wei, Nanotechnology 28, 165502 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6528/aa6320, Google ScholarCrossref
  31. 31. I. Tomašek, C. J. Horwell, D. E. Damby, H. Barošová, C. Geers, A. Petri-Fink, B. Rothen-Rutishauser, and M. J. D. Clift, Part. Fibre Toxicol. 13, 67 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12989-016-0178-9, Google ScholarCrossref
  32. 32. ICRP, “Human respiratory tract model for radiological protection,” in Annals of International Commission on Radiological Protection (Ann ICRP, UK, 1994). Google Scholar
  33. 33. H. Olstrup, C. Johansson, and B. Forsberg, Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 13, 249 (2016). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph13030249, Google ScholarCrossref
  34. 34. L. Thoo, M. Z. Fahmi, I. N. Zulkipli, N. Keasberry, and A. Idris, Cent. Eur. J. Immunol. 42, 324 (2017). https://doi.org/10.5114/ceji.2017.70978, Google ScholarCrossref
  35. 35. G. Bachler, S. Losert, Y. Umehara, N. Von Goetz, L. Rodriguez-Lorenzo, A. Petri-Fink, B. Rothen-Rutishauser, and K. Hungerbuehler, Part. Fibre Toxicol. 12, 18 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12989-015-0090-8, Google ScholarCrossref
  36. 36. S. K. Balasubramanian, K.-W. Poh, C.-N. Ong, W. G. Kreyling, W.-Y. Ong, and L. E. Yu, Biomaterials 34, 5439 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.03.080, Google ScholarCrossref
  37. 37. W. G. Kreyling et al., ACS Nano 8, 222 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1021/nn403256v, Google ScholarCrossref
  38. 38. H. S. Choi et al., Nat. Biotechnol. 28, 1300 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.1696, Google ScholarCrossref
  39. 39. See supplementary material at https://doi.org/10.1116/1.5043373 E-BJIOBN-13-308806 for elemental analyis of CNDs, TEM micrographs of N-CNDs-1, CNDs stability in DMEM, and LSM spectra of CNDs. Google Scholar
  40. All article content, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).